Formal decision making: Difference between revisions
From Reconciling understandings of Scripture and Science
Jump to navigationJump to search
(removing judicial language) |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
# All reviewers discuss briefly, and get an idea of answers. | # All reviewers discuss briefly, and get an idea of answers. | ||
# One or more writes up his/her preliminary conclusions together or separately. | # One or more writes up his/her preliminary conclusions together or separately. | ||
# All read, discuss, refine if necessary until unanimous or | # All read, discuss, refine if necessary until unanimous or majority decision is reached and ticked off as ready to be reported, without waiting for supplementary comments or contrary conclusions. | ||
# All who '''concur''' with the majority conclusion and wish to contribute ''supplementary comments'' do so. | # All who '''concur''' with the majority conclusion and wish to contribute ''supplementary comments'' do so. | ||
# All who '''do not concur''' with the majority conclusion contribute alternative or dissenting conclusions if they wish. | # All who '''do not concur''' with the majority conclusion contribute alternative or dissenting conclusions if they wish. |
Revision as of 23:17, 15 May 2018
PROCESS FOR ARRIVING AT A STRUCTURED DECISION
- All reviewers discuss briefly, and get an idea of answers.
- One or more writes up his/her preliminary conclusions together or separately.
- All read, discuss, refine if necessary until unanimous or majority decision is reached and ticked off as ready to be reported, without waiting for supplementary comments or contrary conclusions.
- All who concur with the majority conclusion and wish to contribute supplementary comments do so.
- All who do not concur with the majority conclusion contribute alternative or dissenting conclusions if they wish.