Formal decision making

PROCESS FOR ARRIVING AT A STRUCTURED DECISION

based on legal procedures described here: It's a good model for delivering good judgements even when the judges disagree, and preserving dissenting judgements that may prove correct with the passage of time. Bruce (talk) 12:16, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

1. All reviewers discuss briefly, and get an idea of answers.
2. One or more writes his/her “judgement” together or separately.
3. All read, discuss, refine if necessary until unanimous or majory decision is reached and ticked off as ready to be reported, without waiting for supplementary comments or alternative judgements.
4. All who concur with the majority decision and wish to contribute supplementary comments do so.
5. All who do not concur with the majority decision contribute alternative ("dissenting") judgements if they wish.