Formal decision making: Difference between revisions
From Reconciling understandings of Scripture and Science
Jump to navigationJump to search
(listing steps to be taken) |
(italics for clarity) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
# One or more writes his/her “judgement” together or separately. | # One or more writes his/her “judgement” together or separately. | ||
# All read, discuss, refine if necessary until unanimous or majory decision is reached and ticked off as ready to be reported, without waiting for supplementary comments or alternative judgements. | # All read, discuss, refine if necessary until unanimous or majory decision is reached and ticked off as ready to be reported, without waiting for supplementary comments or alternative judgements. | ||
# All who '''concur''' with the majority decision and wish to contribute supplementary comments do so. | # All who '''concur''' with the majority decision and wish to contribute ''supplementary comments'' do so. | ||
# All who '''do not concur''' with the majority decision contribute alternative ("dissenting") judgements if they wish. | # All who '''do not concur''' with the majority decision contribute ''alternative ("dissenting") judgements'' if they wish. |
Revision as of 13:51, 19 March 2018
PROCESS FOR ARRIVING AT A STRUCTURED DECISION
- All reviewers discuss briefly, and get an idea of answers.
- One or more writes his/her “judgement” together or separately.
- All read, discuss, refine if necessary until unanimous or majory decision is reached and ticked off as ready to be reported, without waiting for supplementary comments or alternative judgements.
- All who concur with the majority decision and wish to contribute supplementary comments do so.
- All who do not concur with the majority decision contribute alternative ("dissenting") judgements if they wish.