FormulationRC1: Difference between revisions

From Reconciling understandings of Scripture and Science
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{| style="border-spacing: 8px; border: 4px solid SlateGray; background: #F4F5FD;"
{| style="border-spacing: 8px; border: 4px solid SlateGray; background: #F4F5FD;"
|- style="text-align: left;"  
|- style="text-align: left;"  
| <span style="color: DarkSlateGray;">'''Reconciliation Challenge PQRC 1 &mdash; Acts 17:26 &ndash; a single male ancestor?'''</span>  
| <span style="color: DarkSlateGray;">'''Reconciliation Challenge [[PQRC]] 1 &mdash; Acts 17:26 &ndash; a single male ancestor?'''</span>  
|-
|-
| <span style="color: DarkSlateGray;">There is a body of scientific evidence that people are not descended from a single male ancestor. [[Acts 17:26]] includes the statement that God “made ''from one [man/source/stock(?)]'', every nation of mankind to live on all the face of the earth”. Can these be reconciled?</span>  
| <span style="color: DarkSlateGray;">There is a body of scientific evidence that people are not descended from a single male ancestor. [[Acts 17:26]] includes the statement that God “made ''from one [man/source/stock(?)]'', every nation of mankind to live on all the face of the earth”. Can these be reconciled?</span>  

Revision as of 00:29, 17 February 2019

Reconciliation Challenge PQRC 1 — Acts 17:26 – a single male ancestor?
There is a body of scientific evidence that people are not descended from a single male ancestor. Acts 17:26 includes the statement that God “made from one [man/source/stock(?)], every nation of mankind to live on all the face of the earth”. Can these be reconciled?
Suggested Appraised Formulated Discussed Conclusions
here here here here and here here