Qms:Objections to Science itself: Difference between revisions
From Reconciling understandings of Scripture and Science
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''[[Qms:Questioning Mainstream Science#summary|← to Qms:Questioning Mainstream Science index]]''<br> | ''[[Qms:Questioning Mainstream Science#summary|← to Qms:Questioning Mainstream Science index]]''<br> | ||
==<span id="changing"></span>Science is "always changing"== | ==<span id="changing"></span>Science is "always changing"== | ||
Science is sometimes criticised as "always changing". The idea is that if it needed to be corrected it must have been wrong; therefore as "ever-changing science", it is probably still wrong. Science, however, homes in on truth by ''constant'' correction and refinement: it approaches truth asymptotically. This is a powerful truth-seeking technique, seen, for example, in hill-climbing algorithms. The simple claim that science is "always wrong" is a misrepresentation. | Science is sometimes criticised as "always changing". The idea is that if it needed to be corrected it must have been wrong; therefore as "ever-changing science", it is probably still wrong. Science, however, homes in on truth by ''constant'' correction and refinement: it approaches truth asymptotically. This is a powerful truth-seeking technique, seen, for example, in hill-climbing algorithms. The simple claim that science is "always wrong" is a [[Unworthy Arguments#misrep|misrepresentation]]. |
Revision as of 20:21, 19 September 2019
← to Qms:Questioning Mainstream Science index
Science is "always changing"
Science is sometimes criticised as "always changing". The idea is that if it needed to be corrected it must have been wrong; therefore as "ever-changing science", it is probably still wrong. Science, however, homes in on truth by constant correction and refinement: it approaches truth asymptotically. This is a powerful truth-seeking technique, seen, for example, in hill-climbing algorithms. The simple claim that science is "always wrong" is a misrepresentation.