"from one man": Difference between revisions
(trying various improved headings) |
No edit summary |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
:''(Not to be confused with the paper ''"[[C. Byrnes, By One Man|By One Man]]"'' by | :''(Not to be confused with the paper ''"[[C. Byrnes, By One Man|By One Man]]"'' by bro {{CByrnes}})'' | ||
<font color="red" | <font color="red">Please keep this page for a ''summary'' list of Bible passages directly related to Monogenism, not for discussion or general arguments.</font> — [[User:Bruce|Bruce]] 9 May & 12 July 2018 | ||
==[[Acts_17:26|Acts 17:26]]== | ==[[Acts_17:26|Acts 17:26]]== | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
See comments about the [[reading in context|context]] ''[[Acts 17:26#context|here]]'' on the [[Acts 17:26#context|Acts 17:26]] page. See thoughts about blood ''[[Acts 17:26#blood|here]]'' on the same page. | See comments about the [[reading in context|context]] ''[[Acts 17:26#context|here]]'' on the [[Acts 17:26#context|Acts 17:26]] page. See thoughts about blood ''[[Acts 17:26#blood|here]]'' on the same page. | ||
=== Problem to be reconciled: | === Problem to be reconciled: === | ||
See separate page [[Reconciliation challenge: a literal single male ancestor, or modern science? (Acts 17:26)]]. ''(Historical discussion about this description is now transferred to the Discussion page.)'' | |||
See | ==Book of Jubilees== | ||
See [[Primordial Incest in the book of Jubilees]] | |||
==Contrary evidence== | |||
See [[Evidence that people are not descended from a single male ancestor]] for Biblical and scientific evidence. |
Latest revision as of 13:52, 30 July 2019
- (Not to be confused with the paper "By One Man" by bro Colin Byrnes)
Please keep this page for a summary list of Bible passages directly related to Monogenism, not for discussion or general arguments. — Bruce 9 May & 12 July 2018
Acts 17:26
God has made all nations to inhabit the whole earth from "one". From one what, though? The Greek doesn't specify. See the two possible interpretations here - either from one ancestral group, or from one person.
It is suggested that we should read it as meaning "from one person", who would be Adam, and that therefore this verse is in conflict with modern genetics.
See comments about the context here on the Acts 17:26 page. See thoughts about blood here on the same page.
Problem to be reconciled:
See separate page Reconciliation challenge: a literal single male ancestor, or modern science? (Acts 17:26). (Historical discussion about this description is now transferred to the Discussion page.)
Book of Jubilees
See Primordial Incest in the book of Jubilees
Contrary evidence
See Evidence that people are not descended from a single male ancestor for Biblical and scientific evidence.