"from one man": Difference between revisions

From Reconciling understandings of Scripture and Science
Jump to navigationJump to search
(trying various improved headings)
(clean up - discussion transferred to talk page)
Line 11: Line 11:
See comments about the [[reading in context|context]] ''[[Acts 17:26#context|here]]'' on the [[Acts 17:26#context|Acts 17:26]] page.  See thoughts about blood ''[[Acts 17:26#blood|here]]'' on the same page.
See comments about the [[reading in context|context]] ''[[Acts 17:26#context|here]]'' on the [[Acts 17:26#context|Acts 17:26]] page.  See thoughts about blood ''[[Acts 17:26#blood|here]]'' on the same page.


=== Problem to be reconciled: if Acts 17:26 refers to Adam it is unscientific ===
=== Problem to be reconciled: ===
<font color="red">Trying out better headings below:</font> [[User:Bruce|Bruce]] ([[User talk:Bruce|talk]]) 23:18, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
See separate page [[Reconciliation challenge: a literal single male ancestor, or modern science? (Acts 17:26)]]. ''(Historical discussion about this description is now transferred to the Discussion page.)''
=== Problem to be reconciled: if Acts 17:36 refers to a literal single male ancestor, it is contrary to modern science===
=== Problem to be reconciled: a literal single male ancestor, or modern science? ===
=== Reconciliation challenge: a literal single male ancestor, or modern science? ===
 
See separate page [[Problem: if Acts 17:26 refers to Adam, it is unscientific|Problem: if Acts 17:36 refers to a literal single male ancestor, it is contrary to modern science]]
: &mdash; [[User:Bruce|Bruce]] ([[User talk:Bruce|talk]]) 03:41, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:06, 10 May 2018

(Not to be confused with the paper "By One Man" by C. Byrnes)

Please keep this page for a summary list of Bible passages directly related to Monogenism, not for discussion or general arguments. Maybe. Let's decide later. There's a Monogenism page, so we might not need this page at all. Bruce (talk)

Acts 17:26

God has made all nations to inhabit the whole earth from "one". From one what, though? The Greek doesn't specify. See the two possible interpretations here - either from one ancestral group, or from one person.

It is suggested that we should read it as meaning "from one person", who would be Adam, and that therefore this verse is in conflict with modern genetics.

See comments about the context here on the Acts 17:26 page. See thoughts about blood here on the same page.

Problem to be reconciled:

See separate page Reconciliation challenge: a literal single male ancestor, or modern science? (Acts 17:26). (Historical discussion about this description is now transferred to the Discussion page.)