Ron Cowie
- Beliefs re the Age of the Earth
- Beliefs re the Origin of Death and Predation in Nature
- Biology Timeline
- C. Byrnes, By One Man
- Critical appraisal: How should we understand Eden?
- Critical appraisal: Meaning of "very good"
- Critical appraisal: The Origin of Mortality
- Critical appraisal: The Punishment of Adam
- Current Topics for Consideration
- Historical Christadelphian Approaches - 11
- Historical Christadelphian Approaches - 4
- How should we understand the Tree of Life?
- Meaning of "very good"
- The Origin of Mortality
- The punishment of Adam
- Theistic Evolution - The Unique Challenges of the 'LAST DAYS' (a series of fifteen talks)
- "Two Books"
- "Challenges to Faith" Conference: Ron Cowie, "Theistic Evolution" — see following:
Youth Conference presentation "Challenges to Faith"
UK online conference, March 2021, available here [site down 4 Mar 2024]
The lecture was illustrated by 53 slides; we have broken it into 53 sections, and made it available here on this wiki for comment and discussion by logged-in wiki users — please join in, whatever your view is! We challenge him to defend his claims against evolution, and particularly the lack of Biblical evidence for them. He does cite Psalm 33:6 in the talk, though in support of instantaneous creation, not against evolution directly — but he cites no other Scripture to back his claims against evolution — one verse, and irrelevant at that!
An AI comment on the talk (by chatGPT)
"Overall, the argument presented is based on subjective interpretations, lacks logical coherence, and fails to provide substantial evidence to support its claims. It is important to critically evaluate arguments and consider alternative viewpoints before accepting them as valid."
Crooked thinking
This slide, from one of his "Unique Challenges" talks to Christadelphian young people, illustrates his approach of demonising and misrepresenting Christadelphians who accept Theistic Evolution. The only Christadelphian who says "God did not bother" is Ron Cowie himself, when he's describing a rational argument as a "tactic" and putting words into other people's mouths. It's a smear, at the bottom of the list of Unworthy Arguments. — Bruce
{{#setmainimage:Sutherland logo-icon.png}}